Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine
Facet Disease and the Future of Bone Imaging
Barry Julius, MD
Scott Britz-Cunningham, MD
October 14, 2003
Presentation
A 65-year-old male with history of prostate cancer presented with neck
pain upon rotation.
Imaging Technique
27.0 mCi of Tc-99m MDP was administered intravenously at the right
antecubital fossa. Anterior and posterior whole body delayed planar
imaging and SPECT imaging of the cervical spine were subsequently
performed.
Imaging Findings
Planar
bone scan imaging demonstrates a moderate focus of increased uptake
at the left aspect of the approximate C3/4 level (shown
by arrow)
as well as increased uptake at the right knee patella and medial
compartment (arrow head) likely related to degenerative changes. There
is also mild to moderate increased focal uptake at the right ischial
tuberosity most likely related to osseous spurring or entesopathy. And
there is bilateral first MCP foci likely related to osteoarthitic
changes. SPECT
imaging of the cervical spine confirms abnormal uptake overlying
the approximate left C3/4 level (shown
by arrows).
MRI
of the cervical spine demonstrates findings consistent with
hypertrophy of the facets at the left C3/4 level (shown
by arrows)
on the T1 and T2 axial and sagittal images. There is also a T2 dark
soft tissue lesion eroding the dens noted on the sagittal image
consistent with pannus formation.
Diagnosis
Left C3/4 facet disease, which is the likely cause of the patient’s
symptomatology and clinical history.
Discussion
Introduction:
Facet disease is a common cause for chronic back pain with a prevalence
of disease ranging from 8-75%. One study demonstrated that it may be
the most common cause of back pain based upon osteoporotic patients
that were treated for facet disease. The pathophysiology causing the
pain is multifactorial and includes pain produced from prostaglandins
and inflammatory mediators, facet capsular autonomic nerve irritation,
and nociceptive substance P. These factors may be stimulated by a
number of different processes including inflammatory arthritis,
osteoarthritis, microtrauma, and distension and inflammation of the
synovial capsule.
Imaging Modalities:
The primary imaging modalities at the present time are plain film, CT
scan, MRI, and Tc-99m–MDP bone scintigraphy.
Treatment:
Multiple treatment modalites are available for patients with facet
disease. These include multiple noninvasive and invasive treatments
from physical therapy, steroid or local anesthetic injection,
radiofrequency ablation of the facet joint, to surgical fusion. The
current literature does not support any mitigation of the patient
symptoms from the most invasive approach, surgical fusion, or the least
invasive approach, physical therapy.
Steroid or local anesthetic is often injected for relief of symptoms
from facet disease with a 10-63% success rate over a short term time
period. At Brigham and Women Hospital, this is a common procedure for
relief of symptoms. Radiofrequency ablation also demonstrates a large
range of success rates from 17-86% as well.
Potential Future Facet Imaging with Flouride Ion Positron Emission
Tomography:
The mechanism of uptake of fluorine ion is similar to MDP in that it
acts through chemisorption. Specifically, F-18 ion replaces the
hydroxyl ion on hydroxapatite crystal to form fluoroapatite within the
osseous matrix. With this mechanism of chemisorption, the fluorine ion
binds more efficiently to the osseous matrix compared to Tc99m-MDP. In
fact, one study demonstrated 3 to 10 times greater binding efficiency
to metastatic lesions compared to Tc99m-MDP. Twice as many osseous
lesions were noted of which several changed patient management. And,
positron emission tomography improves the spatial resolution of the
study. Therefore, fluoride ion imaging may be a superior imaging agent
for detection of symptom specific levels of facet disease. And, this
may help to specify the exact level of treatment for the
interventionalist that can sometimes be difficult with SPECT Tc99m-MDP.
Further study is needed.
References
1. Cook GJ. Hannaford E. See M. Clarke SE Fogelman I. The value of bone
scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoporotic patients with back pain.
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 2002; 314(4)245-8.
2. Holder LE. Marchin JL Asdourian PL. Links JM. Sexton CC. Planar
and high resolution SPECT bone imaging in the diagnosis of facet
syndrome. J Nucl Med 1995; 36:37-44.
3. Ryan PJ. Evans PA Gibson T. Fogelman I. Chronic low back pain:
comparison of bone SPECT with radiography and CT. Radiology 1992;
182:849-854.
4. Schirrmeister H. Guhlmann A. Eisner K, et al: Sensitivity in
detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: Planar bone
scintigraphy versus 18F PET. J Nucl Med 1999; 40:1623-1629.
Click here to go
to Joint Program in Nuclear Medicine home page and Copyright
notice.
J. Anthony Parker, MD PhD, Tony_Parker@CareGroup.Harvard.edu